Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike Moschos's avatar

Well written. Something I would add is that much of America's, as mr Rove calls it, "healing" came from the bottom up not the oval Office. McKinley may have played a role, but he was in a decentralized and pluralized country filled with like institutions, decentralized mass-member political parties, a rich and diversified world world of associations (and it turns out deliberately structurally created and maintained, when they later died, they didnt die *natural* deaths), much stronger local governments, a decentralized and geographically and sectorally diffused banking/finance system that was relative to today quite pluralized, an economy that was structurally designed to be one dominated by mid sized firms that continuously brought people, as they were designed to do, into shared public life.

During the time period the McKinley admin occurred in, many of these institutions reached huge scale and they organically integrated into an era of economic recovery (and I mean integrated, many were directly involved in capital allocation decision making . McKinley's presidency did well in part because those organization and the broader institutional topology already existed. In practice, they were some of the most important mechanisms by which the reconciliation this essay mentions occurred. economic coordination, and political incorporation actually occurred

Those organizations were of a fundamentally different institutional architecture than today's. So national reconciliation was not just a presidential leadership matter where almost all people had no role in it, thats wasnt the case and at least in vast and highly diversified territories its unlikely to ever be the case anywhere

Susan Smith's avatar

What can we expect from Karl Rove except a gloss to make a poor president look better?

I am disappointed in "In Pursuit."

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?